Skip to main content
TLI.

Indicator · TLI ind_acled_fatalities_per_100k_5yr

ACLED-Recorded Conflict Fatalities Per 100,000 Population, 5-Year Window

จำนวนผู้เสียชีวิตจากเหตุการณ์ความขัดแย้ง (ACLED) ต่อประชากร 100,000 คน ใน 5 ปี

AS OF 29 APR 2026 fatalities/100k (5yr) Weight 1

Source

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED)

Independent academic crisis-monitoring database covering protests, riots, and armed conflict events worldwide. TLI uses a 5-year rolling window over ACLED events. Refresh: weekly upstream; TLI re-pulls monthly.

Goalposts

The 0-to-100 score for this indicator is normalized against fixed methodology goalposts. The values below define the band; click through to the methodology page for the framework that anchors them.

Score 100
0 fatalities/100k (5yr)
Score 0
2 fatalities/100k (5yr)
Direction
Lower is better
Anchor
Fitted to the Thai provincial distribution

Goalposts of 0 and 2 conflict fatalities per 100,000 residents over five years were re-fit on 2026-04-30 from 0/5. The prior 0/5 band produced binary results: only the Deep South three exceeded the ceiling and the other 72 provinces all scored 100 with no spread. The tighter 0/2 band differentiates the bulk distribution. Pattani (14.36), Narathiwat (14.24), and Yala (10.25) still clip to zero, which is methodologically correct for the relocation-decision audience.

Live distribution: 57 of 77 provinces clip at the score-100 ceiling ; 3 of 77 clip at the score-0 floor.

Which Thai province leads on ACLED-Recorded Conflict Fatalities Per 100,000 Population, 5-Year Window?

57 Thai provinces share the maximum TLI score of 100/100 on ACLED-Recorded Conflict Fatalities Per 100,000 Population, 5-Year Window; the strongest by raw value are Phuket , Chon Buri , and Rayong (raw values from 0 to 0 fatalities/100k (5yr)). The bottom of the distribution is Pattani (14.36 fatalities/100k (5yr), score 0/100).

Coverage

77 of 77 Thai provinces. Median score: 100. Each province's score is normalized 0–100 against fixed goalposts; a higher score is more favorable.

Reading the columns. Raw value the actual measurement in fatalities/100k (5yr). Score normalized 0–100 against fixed methodology goalposts (not a percentile). Lower is better. Why ties? 57 provinces share the score-100 ceiling because their raw values meet or exceed the upper goalpost. 3 share the score-0 floor at the lower goalpost. Provinces beyond the goalposts aren't separated further — that's the trade-off for fixed, year-over-year comparable scoring instead of percentiles.

Top scorers

Rank Province Raw value (fatalities/100k (5yr)) Score
1 Phuket 0 100
2 Chon Buri 0 100
3 Rayong 0 100
4 Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya 0 100
5 Phangnga 0 100

Lowest scorers

Rank Province Raw value (fatalities/100k (5yr)) Score
77 Pattani 14.363 0
76 Narathiwat 14.245 0
75 Yala 10.25 0
74 Chiang Rai 1.929 3.5
73 Songkhla 0.98 51
Show all 77 provinces ranked Sorted highest to lowest score
Rank Province Raw value (fatalities/100k (5yr)) Score
1 Phuket 0 100
2 Chon Buri 0 100
3 Rayong 0 100
4 Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya 0 100
5 Phangnga 0 100
6 Samut Songkhram 0 100
7 Saraburi 0 100
8 Samut Sakhon 0 100
9 Lamphun 0 100
10 Phetchaburi 0 100
11 Chumphon 0 100
12 Samut Prakan 0 100
13 Trat 0 100
14 Prachuap Khiri Khan 0 100
15 Krabi 0 100
16 Nonthaburi 0 100
17 Nakhon Nayok 0 100
18 Chachoengsao 0 100
19 Ranong 0 100
20 Satun 0 100
21 Pathum Thani 0 100
22 Sing Buri 0 100
23 Phitsanulok 0 100
24 Chanthaburi 0 100
25 Sukhothai 0 100
26 Lampang 0 100
27 Nakhon Si Thammarat 0 100
28 Nong Khai 0 100
29 Udon Thani 0 100
30 Nakhon Ratchasima 0 100
31 Phrae 0 100
32 Ang Thong 0 100
33 Chai Nat 0 100
34 Uttaradit 0 100
35 Khon Kaen 0 100
36 Uthai Thani 0 100
37 Phayao 0 100
38 Nan 0 100
39 Nakhon Sawan 0 100
40 Loei 0 100
41 Phichit 0 100
42 Suphan Buri 0 100
43 Mukdahan 0 100
44 Buri Ram 0 100
45 Si Sa Ket 0 100
46 Chaiyaphum 0 100
47 Mae Hong Son 0 100
48 Sakon Nakhon 0 100
49 Phetchabun 0 100
50 Kalasin 0 100
51 Kamphaeng Phet 0 100
52 Yasothon 0 100
53 Bueng Kan 0 100
54 Roi Et 0 100
55 Amnat Charoen 0 100
56 Nong Bua Lam Phu 0 100
57 Maha Sarakham 0 100
58 Ubon Ratchathani 0.054 97.3
59 Bangkok 0.055 97.2
60 Surin 0.074 96.3
61 Nakhon Pathom 0.108 94.6
62 Kanchanaburi 0.112 94.4
63 Ratchaburi 0.116 94.2
64 Lopburi 0.139 93
65 Nakhon Phanom 0.141 93
66 Trang 0.158 92.1
67 Surat Thani 0.186 90.7
68 Phatthalung 0.193 90.3
69 Prachin Buri 0.199 90
70 Chiang Mai 0.222 88.9
71 Tak 0.284 85.8
72 Sa Kaeo 0.357 82.2
73 Songkhla 0.98 51
74 Chiang Rai 1.929 3.5
75 Yala 10.25 0
76 Narathiwat 14.245 0
77 Pattani 14.363 0

Methodology

See the methodology page for the full TLI scoring approach, including how this indicator's category Safety & Governance combines with the other six categories via geometric mean.

Cite as: "ACLED-Recorded Conflict Fatalities Per 100,000 Population, 5-Year Window." Thailand Livability Index, 2026. CC BY-NC 4.0.

Other indicators in Safety & Governance

Browse all indicators →